Smart Contract Security: 9 Best Practices

Smart contracts handle big money and data on the blockchain, but they're also prime targets for hackers. Once deployed, they can't be changed, so mistakes can be costly. Here's how to keep your smart contracts safe:

1. Conduct thorough code audits
2. Implement proper access controls
3. Use secure coding patterns
4. Handle external calls safely
5. Manage gas efficiently
6. Implement effective error handling
7. Use formal verification techniques
8. Implement upgrade mechanisms carefully
9. Conduct regular security assessments

Recent attacks highlight the importance of security:

• Euler Finance lost $197 million in March 2023
• Platypus lost $2.23 million in October 2023
• $720 million lost in Q3 2023 alone

Year	Project	Loss	Cause
2016	The DAO	$150 million	Smart contract flaw
2022	DODO DEX	$3.8 million	Contract vulnerability
2023	Yearn Finance	$10 million	Contract flaws

Even small errors can be expensive. Hegic lost $48,000 due to a typo.

Key steps for smart contract security:

• Check code carefully
• Test thoroughly
• Get expert audits
• Monitor for new threats

This guide covers 9 ways to boost smart contract safety and protect your users' trust.

Related video from YouTube

1. Conduct Thorough Code Audits

Smart contract audits are a must-do for Web3 projects. They help catch bugs and keep your users' money safe. Let's break down how to do them right.

Find the Weak Spots

Code audits look for problems in your smart contracts. They're like a safety check before you go live. Here's why they matter:

• The DAO Hack in 2016 lost $150 million due to a code flaw
• In 2017, Parity's wallet bug cost users $30 million

To avoid these issues:

1. Set clear audit goals
2. Pick an experienced auditor
3. Check all code and dependencies
4. Get a clear report with fix-it steps

Lock Down Access

Good docs make audits easier. Before your audit:

• Write out what your system should do in plain English
• List the rules your code must follow
• Show who can do what in your system

Write Clean Code

Clean code = fewer mistakes. Here's how:

• Use standard naming rules
• Fix all compiler warnings
• Run a code formatter
• Add comments to explain tricky parts

Keep Watching

One audit isn't enough. Keep checking your code:

• Run different types of tests
• Test as much of your code as possible
• Try both good and bad scenarios

Audit Step	Why It Matters
Clear goals	Focuses the audit
Experienced auditor	Finds more issues
Check all code	Leaves no stone unturned
Good documentation	Helps auditors understand faster
Clean code	Makes auditing easier
Ongoing tests	Catches new problems

Stop changing your code before an audit. This gives auditors a stable version to check.

Use tools like Slither to get easy-to-read summaries of your contracts. And consider using tested libraries like OpenZeppelin to boost security.

2. Implement Proper Access Controls

Smart contracts need strong access controls to keep bad actors out. Let's look at how to do this right.

Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)

RBAC is a powerful way to manage who can do what in your smart contract. It's like giving out different keys to different people.

Here's how it works:

1. You create different roles (like "admin" or "user")
2. Each role gets specific permissions
3. You assign roles to different addresses

OpenZeppelin's AccessControl makes this easy. Here's a quick example:

import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol";

contract MyToken is ERC20, AccessControl {
    bytes32 public constant MINTER_ROLE = keccak256("MINTER_ROLE");

    constructor() ERC20("MyToken", "MTK") {
        _setupRole(DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE, msg.sender);
        _setupRole(MINTER_ROLE, msg.sender);
    }

    function mint(address to, uint256 amount) public {
        require(hasRole(MINTER_ROLE, msg.sender), "Must have minter role to mint");
        _mint(to, amount);
    }
}

In this code, only addresses with the MINTER_ROLE can create new tokens.

Least Privilege Principle

Give each role only the permissions it needs. No more, no less. This limits the damage if someone's account gets hacked.

For example, you could have separate roles for minting and burning tokens:

bytes32 public constant BURNER_ROLE = keccak256("BURNER_ROLE");

function burn(address from, uint256 amount) public {
    require(hasRole(BURNER_ROLE, msg.sender), "Must have burner role to burn");
    _burn(from, amount);
}

Keep Your Access Controls Up-to-Date

Access control isn't set-and-forget. You need to update it as your project grows. Use functions to add or remove permissions:

function grantMinterRole(address account) public {
    grantRole(MINTER_ROLE, account);
}

function revokeMinterRole(address account) public {
    revokeRole(MINTER_ROLE, account);
}

Real-World Examples

1. MakerDAO: They use access control to decide who can update price oracles. This stops people from messing with asset values.

2. Compound: Their Comptroller contract only lets admins or "borrow cap guardians" set new borrow caps for markets.

3. Parity Multisig Hack (2017): A flaw in access control let hackers steal millions in Ether. This shows why good access control matters.

Access Control Methods Compared

Method	Pros	Cons
Role-Based (RBAC)	Fine-grained control, Flexible	More complex to set up
Ownable Pattern	Simple, Easy to use	One person has all the power
Multisignature	Spreads out control, Safer	More gas costs, More complex

Tips for Better Access Control

1. Test your access controls thoroughly
2. Use the least privilege principle
3. Get your code audited regularly
4. Use timelock contracts for big changes
5. Tell users about access control changes

3. Use Secure Coding Patterns

Know Your Vulnerabilities

Smart contract developers need to stay on top of common security issues. Here are some key vulnerabilities to watch out for:

• Reentrancy attacks
• Integer overflow and underflow
• Timestamp dependence
• Tx.origin authentication

Keep learning about these and new threats as they pop up.

Stick to Safe Coding Practices

Use these coding patterns to boost your smart contract security:

1. Checks-Effects-Interactions: This pattern helps stop reentrancy attacks. Do all your checks and state changes before interacting with other contracts.

2. Pull over Push: For payments, let users withdraw funds instead of sending them automatically. This cuts down on failed transfers.

3. Use SafeMath: Prevent math errors with OpenZeppelin's SafeMath library.

Here's a quick example of SafeMath in action:

import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol";

contract SecureContract {
    using SafeMath for uint256;

    function safeAdd(uint256 a, uint256 b) public pure returns (uint256) {
        return a.add(b);
    }
}

Be Careful with External Calls

Always assume external calls might fail. Use the Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern and think about using a withdrawal pattern for payments.

Here's an example of a safe withdrawal function:

function withdraw() public {
    uint amount = balances[msg.sender];
    balances[msg.sender] = 0;
    (bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}("");
    require(success, "Transfer failed.");
}

This approach helps prevent reentrancy and makes sure state changes happen before external interactions.

Real-World Examples

Project	Vulnerability	Impact	Lesson Learned
The DAO (2016)	Reentrancy	$60 million lost	Always use the Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern
Parity Multisig Wallet (2017)	Unprotected function	$30 million frozen	Implement proper access controls
Poly Network (2021)	Poor access control	$610 million stolen (later returned)	Regularly audit your code and use secure libraries

These cases show why using secure coding patterns is so important. They're not just best practices – they're essential for protecting user funds and maintaining trust in your project.

Key Takeaways

• Know the common vulnerabilities in smart contracts
• Use established security patterns like Checks-Effects-Interactions
• Be extra careful with external calls and math operations
• Learn from past hacks and apply those lessons to your code
• Keep updating your security knowledge and practices

4. Handle External Calls Safely

External calls in smart contracts can be risky. They're like sending a message to another contract, but you can't always trust what happens next. Let's look at how to make these calls safer.

Why External Calls Are Tricky

When your contract talks to another one, it's like handing over control for a moment. This can lead to problems:

• The other contract might do something unexpected
• It could try to call back into your contract before you're done (reentrancy attack)
• The call might fail, leaving your contract in a mess

Real-World Oops: The DAO Hack

In 2016, a project called The DAO lost $60 million because of a reentrancy attack. Ouch! This shows why we need to be extra careful with external calls.

How to Make External Calls Safer

1. Update Your State First: Change your contract's data before making the call.
2. Use the Checks-Effects-Interactions Pattern: Check conditions, update your state, then interact with other contracts.
3. Be Ready for Failure: Always assume the call might not work.

Here's a good way to handle a withdrawal:

function withdraw() public {
    uint amount = shares[msg.sender];
    shares[msg.sender] = 0;
    (bool success,) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}("");
    require(success, "Transfer failed.");
}

This code updates the user's balance before sending money. If the send fails, it won't let the user try again with the same balance.

Watch Out for These

Issue	Why It's Bad	How to Fix It
Reentrancy	Attacker can drain funds	Use mutex locks or update state first
Unchecked return values	Might ignore failed calls	Always check if calls succeed
Unexpected state changes	Other contract might change	Assume external state can change

Tips for Safer Calls

• Don't trust other contracts blindly
• Use call() instead of transfer() or send() for sending Ether
• Check return values from all external calls
• Use the SafeERC20 library for token transfers

A Word from the Experts

Solidity docs say: "Any interaction from a contract (A) with another contract (B) and any transfer of Ether hands over control to that contract (B)."

This means you need to be ready for anything when you make an external call.

Remember: in smart contracts, it's better to be safe than sorry. Double-check everything, especially when dealing with other contracts or sending money.

sbb-itb-a178b04

5. Manage Gas Efficiently

Gas costs can make or break a smart contract. Let's look at how to keep them low without sacrificing security.

Optimize Your Code

Small changes can save big on gas. Here are some tricks:

• Use uint256 instead of smaller sizes. Solidity pads them anyway.
• In loops, use ++i instead of i++. It's a bit cheaper.
• For math that can't overflow, use unchecked:

function cheapIncrement(uint256 i) public pure returns (uint256) {
    unchecked { return i + 1; }
}

Store Less, Save More

On-chain storage eats gas. Try these tips:

• Use fixed-size arrays when you can. They're cheaper than dynamic ones.
• Store only what you must. Use events for data you don't need on-chain.
• Batch operations to save on transaction costs.

Real-World Gas Savings

Let's look at some actual examples:

Project	Action	Gas Saved	How They Did It
Uniswap V3	Code optimization	30%	Rewrote core contracts in assembly
OpenZeppelin	Library update	15-30%	Improved ERC20 implementation
Synthetix	Storage restructure	50%	Changed how they store user data

Uniswap's lead developer, Hayden Adams, said: "Every byte counts when you're processing millions of transactions."

Watch Out for Gas Traps

Some patterns can spike your gas costs:

• Loops with unknown bounds
• Reading from storage repeatedly
• Unnecessary state changes

Always test your contract's gas usage with real-world data before deploying.

Tools to Track Gas

Use these to keep an eye on your gas usage:

• Remix IDE's gas estimator
• Hardhat's gas reporter
• Tenderly's gas profiler

These tools can help you spot gas hogs in your code before they hit mainnet.

6. Implement Effective Error Handling

Smart contracts need good error handling to stay safe and work well. Solidity, the language for writing smart contracts, gives us tools to deal with errors that pop up when the contract runs.

Key Error Handling Tools

Solidity has three main ways to handle errors:

1. require(): Checks if things are okay before the contract does something.
2. assert(): Makes sure nothing weird is happening inside the contract.
3. revert(): Stops the contract and tells you why.

Let's see how these work:

function sendMoney(address to, uint amount) public {
    require(amount > 0, "Can't send zero or less");
    require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount, "Not enough money");

    balances[msg.sender] -= amount;
    balances[to] += amount;

    assert(balances[msg.sender] + balances[to] == oldTotal);

    if(!to.send(amount)) {
        revert("Couldn't send the money");
    }
}

This function:

1. Checks if the amount is valid
2. Makes sure the sender has enough money
3. Updates the balances
4. Double-checks the math
5. Tries to send the money and stops if it can't

Real-World Examples

Project	What Happened	Lesson Learned
The DAO (2016)	Lost $60 million due to a code flaw	Always check before changing data
Parity Wallet (2017)	$30 million stuck due to a bug	Test all possible ways things can go wrong
Poly Network (2021)	$610 million stolen (later returned)	Check who's allowed to do what in your contract

These big mistakes show why good error handling matters. It's not just nice to have – it's a must for keeping money safe.

Tips for Better Error Handling

1. Use require() to check inputs and conditions.
2. Put assert() where things should never go wrong.
3. Write clear messages with revert() to explain what went wrong.
4. Test your contract a lot to find problems early.
5. Think about all the ways things could go wrong and plan for them.

Remember: In smart contracts, it's better to stop things before they go wrong than to try to fix them later. Good error handling is your first line of defense against costly mistakes.

7. Use Formal Verification Techniques

Formal verification is a powerful way to boost smart contract security. It's like a super-charged testing method that can prove your contract works as it should.

What is Formal Verification?

Formal verification uses math to check if a smart contract does what it's supposed to. It's different from regular testing because it can cover more ground in less time.

Here's what formal verification can do:

• Find tricky bugs like integer overflows and underflows
• Spot re-entrancy problems that can drain funds
• Check many different scenarios quickly

Real-World Impact

In 2016, The DAO lost $60 million due to a bug that formal verification might have caught. This shows why checking contracts thoroughly is so important.

How to Use Formal Verification

1. Create a Model: Think of your contract as a machine with different states.
2. Set Rules: Define what your contract should and shouldn't do.
3. Use Special Tools: There are programs that can check your contract against your rules.

Here are some tools you can use:

Tool	What It Does
Act	Checks if your contract updates data correctly
Scribble	Turns your rules into code the computer can check
Certora Prover	Automatically checks if your contract follows the rules

Tips for Better Verification

• Start with clear rules about what your contract should do
• Use tools to check your contract before you launch it
• Don't skip this step, even if your contract seems simple

8. Implement Upgrade Mechanisms Carefully

Smart contracts often need updates to fix bugs, add features, or improve performance. But upgrading them isn't simple. Let's look at how to do it safely.

Upgrade Strategies

There are two main ways to upgrade smart contracts:

1. Multi-Contract Approach: Deploy a new contract and move user data to it. This can confuse users because the contract address changes.

2. Upgradeable Smart Contracts (USCs): Use two contracts - a proxy and a logic contract. This keeps the same address but allows upgrades.

Real-World Examples

Big DeFi projects use upgradeable contracts:

Project	Upgrade Strategy	Outcome
Compound	USC	Added new features over time
Aave	USC	Improved platform security
Uniswap V3	USC	Enhanced trading efficiency

These projects show that upgrades can work well when done right.

Safety Measures

Upgrades can be risky. Here's how to make them safer:

• Multi-sig wallets: Require multiple people to approve upgrades.
• Decentralized governance: Let users vote on changes.
• Time-locks: Add a delay before upgrades take effect.

Risks to Watch Out For

Risk	Description	How to Mitigate
Centralization	Few people control upgrades	Use decentralized governance
Bad upgrades	Changes that harm users	Add time-locks for community review
Technical issues	Bugs in the upgrade process	Use formal verification

Tips for Users

1. Check who controls upgrades in a project.
2. Look for time-locks on upgrade proposals.
3. Join governance discussions if you can.

A Word from the Experts

OpenZeppelin, a leading smart contract security firm, says:

"Upgradeable contracts are powerful but introduce new risks. Always use proven patterns and thorough testing."

Remember: upgrades can fix problems, but they need careful planning to avoid creating new ones.

9. Conduct Regular Security Assessments

Regular security checks are key to keeping smart contracts safe. Here's how to do them right:

Find Weak Spots

Use these tools to spot problems:

1. Automated scanners (MythX, Slither)
2. Manual code reviews
3. Third-party audits

In 2021, Polygon used these methods and found a critical bug. They fixed it fast, saving $24 billion in MATIC tokens.

Keep Watch

Set up systems to catch issues early:

• Real-time alerts for odd behavior
• Blockchain tracking tools
• Regular log checks

Chainlink does this well. They caught and fixed a bug in their LINK token contract in 2020 before anyone could exploit it.

Check Who Can Do What

Review access controls often:

What to Do	How Often	Who Does It
Check user roles	Every month	Security team
Review admin access	Every 3 months	Compliance team
Update access rules	Every 6 months	DevOps team

OpenZeppelin, a top smart contract security firm, says: "Regular access reviews stopped 60% of potential exploits in our client projects last year."

Learn from Others

Study past hacks to avoid repeats:

• The DAO hack (2016): $60 million lost
• Parity wallet bug (2017): $30 million frozen
• Poly Network attack (2021): $610 million taken (later returned)

These cases show why constant checks matter.

Tips for Better Assessments

1. Use both automated and manual checks
2. Get fresh eyes on your code regularly
3. Test in real-world conditions
4. Keep up with new attack types
5. Plan for quick fixes if you find issues

Remember: In smart contracts, it's cheaper to prevent problems than to fix them later.

Wrap-up

Smart contract security isn't a one-time task. It's an ongoing process that needs constant attention. By following the nine best practices we've covered, you can greatly reduce the risk of bugs and hacks in your smart contracts.

Here's a quick recap of what we've learned:

Best Practice	Key Takeaway
Code Audits	Regular checks catch issues early
Access Controls	Limit who can do what in your contract
Secure Coding	Use tried-and-true patterns to avoid common pitfalls
External Calls	Be extra careful when interacting with other contracts
Gas Management	Optimize your code to keep costs down
Error Handling	Plan for things to go wrong
Formal Verification	Use math to prove your contract works
Upgrade Mechanisms	Plan for changes, but do it safely
Security Assessments	Keep checking for new threats

The blockchain world is always changing, and so are the risks. You need to stay on your toes to keep your contracts safe.

Some real-world examples show why this matters:

• In 2016, The DAO lost $60 million due to a simple coding error.
• In 2017, Parity's multi-sig wallet bug froze $30 million in Ether.
• In 2021, the Poly Network hack led to a $610 million theft (though the funds were later returned).

These cases prove that even small mistakes can lead to huge losses.

Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum's co-founder, once said: "Security is not a binary property. It's a spectrum." This means you can always do more to make your contracts safer.

As you build on the blockchain, keep security at the top of your mind. It's not just about protecting assets. It's about building trust in the whole ecosystem.

Remember:

• Stay up-to-date with new security threats
• Test your contracts thoroughly before launch
• Be ready to respond quickly if issues come up

Related posts

• GDPR Compliance for DAOs: Legal Implications
• 10 Crypto Exchange Security Best Practices 2024
• Digital Asset Custody: Streamlining Crypto Payments
• On-Chain vs Off-Chain Crypto Transactions: Key Differences